The Best Anchor

-

 Medicine in all its glory, no matter the tech or bad eggs, is still about restoring a man’s life, his body and mind, to its normal state. Slowly but surely, medical doctors in all corners of the world are beginning to accept that just beyond the other members of the team they work within the hospital including the nurses and laboratory scientists, they have to deal with public opinion and political opinion, better put, court for favourable political will.


But this is not about the forced, sometimes laborious, romance between medicine and bureaucrats, with its many failings and ugly smoothening around the edges of everything. This is about the evolution that is sure to charge medicine as we know it and what falls off and what continues to stand. Biased, but I think many parts of medicine will stand the first few waves of the many intrusions (do not read as insults).


A part stands as king amongst the favoured survivors - basic clinical sciences. Pharmacology, Immunology, histopathology, chemical pathology, etc. These basic clinical science fields of study will really define the pace of the future of medicine and whatever innovative care it can offer when merged, either forefuclly or naturally, with changes. It is already beautiful that biomedical scientists can perfectly work with doctors in those fields to offer improved care as the fusion of competent minds can only portend a better future for this part of medicine.


Now, imagine AI, still seems futuristic but I would imagine it is getting closer, with the evangelism of its many use cases in medicine from nursing care to drug dispensing to medical research and so much more. A fusion of the favoured survivors with AI, and many other changes that might align with medicine on its journey, will perhaps have the greatest benefits where the basic clinical science field enjoys a huge effect.


How do we prepare for this? First my country and continent. I am, and will always be a proponent that medical students should no longer be tied to writing final year dissertations in public health anymore especially not with the lopsided political will healthcare ‘enjoys’ in most of the countries. Rather, students should be allowed to carry out projects as far back as basic medical sciences like biochemistry, physiology and histology.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Prosthetic

-
Imagine three men in their early fifties with their female lovers enjoying soulful chatter on a bus and Tade, the second man feels surreal about everything going on except the mechanical sound the bus makes. Why? In all of your wildest thinking, you could never imagine that the soulful chatter, present-in-the-moment life make for a once-in-a-lifetime experience for him in about three decades. He looks away from his feelings back to his baseline and compares himself. These other men and women all have tools in their bodies. From prosthetics to implants and everything else, they just cannot walk, smile, hear and be happy without these machines. No, their happiness isn’t necessarily tied to these things, but you would think so because, you. Have you ever had that feeling where you think your phone is ringing or vibrating while in your pocket and it is not? Maybe one day we realise it’s just these smartphones actually misbehaving and they would like us to think it’s all just in our head. N...
Read more

The Future of Health, Healthcare and Healthcare Delivery (Óòkan)

-
  Like most things that directly and indirectly affect all men, healthcare delivery does. Why health and not medicine? Health, presently defined while taking into consideration the different parts that make up a man, seems to be wholesome compared to just medicine. As medical students, the highlight of that definition was including the spiritual entity of men. There is potential for more distinct entities to be added in the future; political health, technological and/or digital health. Healthcare and its delivery have the potential for major changes in the future and this potential is worth delving into, to help countries of the world and policymakers begin to prepare for what will and might be. The bias to focus on the global south in this future was easily discarded for a broader, global review of the possible future of health. There are many moving parts to health care and its delivery and all of them have the potential for major changes in the future, both near and far. More im...
Read more

ON CANCER

-
The burden of cancer is beyond the number of people affected, it is in the plans and dreams it destroys and the beautiful souls it annihilates while darkening the hearts of those who are related to the victims. Like most chronic diseases, many scientists have made it their life-long commitment to improving the prognosis of these cancers. However, I think there is a caveat that is not judiciously utilised, as I would not want to state that it is rarely or never used. And that caveat is collaborative work amongst scientists and their studies. This collaborative work includes labs with their principal investigators (PIs) working together, beyond university or funding scopes, to answer specific questions that can bring humanity closer to finding a cure to this menace. But the biggest bane is the knowledge gap between all that has been done and the next questions that should be answered. PIs, together with their team members, usually have questions they seek to answer based on the volume of...
Read more